Behind the bombing of the Islamic state in Turkey, there are also internal causes

The attack against the Kurdish party in Turkey poses serious questions about the attitude of the Turkish government towards the fight against the Islamic state. There have been several occasions since the war against the caliphate, in which the attitude of the institutions of the country turkish was not in line with the line of the Atlantic Alliance, preferring to keep a contradictory profile, which did not reveal a clear determination to combat Islamic fundamentalism. The turning point in the country with the arrival in command of Erdogan's party, declared himself moderately confessional, she has become a secular nation and costumes similar to those in Europe, in a state where they were restricted individual freedoms and those of the press and has imposed the company a place in the religious sense too obvious. Turkey has given the impression, like Saudi Arabia, want to maneuver the caliphate, adapting its existence to its national goals and losing sight of the regional balance. The core of this reasoning is that the Turkish institutions fear most Kurdish activism, not that of the Islamic state. Ankara fears of a revival of the Kurdish issue, which can alter the internal balance of the country, not taking into account that the speech was reopened last election result, which saw, in a peaceful way the affirmation of the Kurdish Socialist Party, voted even by the Turks, eager to find a viable alternative opposition to the dominance of the ruling party. Turkey and Islamic state, against the Kurds, have common interests, for both the Kurdish people is an enemy to fight: Ankara sees with concern the military successes and Kurds fear the will of the creation of a free state, as stated by the Kurdish President region of Iraq, the Caliphate began to fear the Kurdish fighters, who are the only ones on the ground, together with the Iranians to face the fundamentalist militia. On the attention of the Turkish institutions about possible attacks of the Islamic state on its territory, the opinion ranges from inability to prevent and laxity that comes close to the voluntariness; some analysts say the possibility that these acts would have occurred had been widely reported by the security services of the country and the underestimation of this warning appears as a worrying sign. On the other side vo is also the possibility that the attack was carried out precisely against the turkish country for its repressive activities against recruiters of the Islamic State well on the soil of the nation. According to this reading is accordingly a warning to the Turkish authorities. This scenario, however, would have more credibility if the attack had not affected the opposition parties, however, it must be acknowledged that against the attackers blocks the preventive activity is objectively more complicated. Perhaps for Turkey is the time to take sides more clearly and at the same time finally address the Kurdish question in a definitive way, looking for a peaceful coexistence that would allow measures of autonomy to the Kurdish people on the ground Kurdish. Believe that the Islamic state is better for the Kurds is a wrong approach, as demonstrated by the same organizations of the Caliphate in Turkey, who have openly expressed their opposition to democracy. For Erdogan's time to make a choice of net and out of its isolationism Sunni who condemned the country, otherwise the door to Europe will be increasingly closed.