The Conservative Party away more and more UK and Europe

The result left the congress of the British Conservative Party is, is a party program, a government program that has everything it takes to bring the UK back many years. The Prime Minister, Theresa May, has chosen to join, in a complete manner, at the worst possible populism, eroding electoral support to the most reactionary political formations, those that caused the European Union output. The May performs, however, two basic errors that the political landscape will soon forgive him. The first mistake is to choose to apply to electors who chose the output from Europe, forgetting that the election result was far from clear and that there are still strong opposition to removal of Brussels, which can not be certainly conquered with a policy based on the country's total closure. It is, however, evident that the May choose to abandon this large part election, to focus on policy design, which, until a short time before, were far from the same programs of the Conservative Party; it is true that the referendum result has dismissed the vision of Cameron, but also of the same May, revealed an inconsistent policy and for this feature, already unreliable. The turnaround of the British prime minister, does not bode well right as far as the fate of the United Kingdom. In fact a political program that is based opportunism and is characterized by a short-sighted vision and focused in the short term, does not seem to be a guarantee of a political vision as to overcome the setbacks that will come from the Europe. This thesis is so true, that he confirm, there is certainly unhurried attitude of the British government in office to start talks with Brussels to regulate the practical effects of the referendum. It is evident that the May acts on two distinct levels, but in deep contrast between them as regards the internal favors the reasons of the spill, but with Europe tends to delay the effects, thus confirming the lack of coherence between saying and do. The second error is to not have drawn from the experience of Cameron no teaching. The former Conservative leader had gambled proclaiming the referendum on Europe, to obtain a personal political advantage, although not at all conducive to expulsion from Brussels. The May seems to repeat the same mistake: settles at positions, which previously did not share, to increase their consent: the question is if it can handle a situation for which he is not entirely convinced. The advertised program, in fact, provides an increasing closure of the UK, who can meet the demands of all those who have recognized in the reasons of removal by the European Union and, in particular, those who are against immigration and see the foreign workers as invaders. It is a cross-audience, which also includes social sectors before belonging to the left, as well as the populist parties, but that geographically it is quite a distance from large urban centers; this means claw May not seek the consent of the most advanced and productive part of the country, but that part, which according to economists' forecasts, will suffer even more so the output from Europe, primarily because it would suffer cutting of the contributions coming from Brussels. The reaction of this social part will only be to remove your consent to the British government expressed by conservatives, suffering a severe political uncertainty on the English scene. On the other hand hope to overcome the difficulties exit from Europe with a program separate negotiations with individual European states seems an unattainable idea, because of the institutional veto in Brussels and the opposition of the most significant components of the Union: yet this point is the one of greater importance in the strategy of May. Once again the United Kingdom expressed the political class appears very little consistency in the medium and long term for Europe, the estrangement that English may not be an advantage.