Blog di discussione su problemi di relazioni e politica internazionale; un osservatorio per capire la direzione del mondo. Blog for discussion on problems of relations and international politics; an observatory to understand the direction of the world.
Politica Internazionale
Cerca nel blog
martedì 21 marzo 2017
The planet's temperature is always higher
Waiting
for the day on March 23, World Day of meteorology, the World
Organisation of Meteorology has issued a rather disturbing report about
the condition of the Earth. Our planet, in fact, has just filed 2016 as warmest year ever recorded, confirming a trend already in place for some time. Compared
to 2015, it was the year where the highest temperatures of the story
had been recorded, the increase was further as compared to
pre-industrial levels raising was measured 1.1 degree centigrade. The
comparison with the present situation before industrialization shows
how increasing temperature and production, with the gradual increase of
the factories on the planet's surface, are intimately connected. On
the other hand the increase in the level of carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere, that continuously tracks new record, only confirms that the
use of ever more stringent fuel in large quantities for industrial
purposes is in large part responsible for the de ' raising the temperature. Closely
related to these reasons are also rising seas, ocean warming, lowering
levels of sea ice, thawing them in the mountain ranges and the
continuous occurrence of extreme events from a climatic point of view. Now
these facts have been thoroughly investigated, and are no longer only
an alarm signal the state of the planet malaise, but are themselves
symptoms of a worsening situation globally. Essentially
the temperature rise is going hand in hand with other changes that are
occurring on the planet: all intimately related phenomena, not to be
taken in a manner absolutely in single exam. Despite
these tangible evidence that there is still stubbornly deny the
evidence, in the name of false progress, aimed at short-term sectoral
gains. As
another define the action of some governments that do not bring any
threshold to the industrial production obtained with the issue of
increasing quantities of carbon dioxide, if not as the search for an
ephemeral enrichment, able to produce less and less remediable faults,
which also requires a contribution in human lives and healthcare expenditure, related to pollution phenomenon, more and more. It
appears undeniable that human activity is causing to the health of the
planet new situations even for scientists, who find it difficult to make
precise predictions to avert the disasters that the temperature
increase appears to be responsible. From
the political point of view, these data will still be snubbed in the
name of opposing theories, which may, however, provide even more thrust
and unregulated industrialization. Trump's
statement in the United States is going in this direction and we come
to the paradox that China, a country known with very high emissions of
carbon dioxide, is trying to defend the environment, while the US, after
the change of president , they are on the other seems the fence. The
reality is that the economy, one that allows almost immediate gains,
also influences the policy of the states, especially those who have
taken the technical skills to narrow the gap with the already
industrialized countries: this run took place, happens and will happen
more and consuming more
fossil fuel, which means necessary for the production cycle and emerge
as countries are able to produce finished products to be placed on the
market. If
on one side the will to produce is understandable to decrease poverty,
but also to always create new audiences of consumers, from another point
of view in an overall reduction of emissions would create more
favorable conditions for the environment. To
achieve this it must take into account the needs of emerging countries
and encourage them, globally, for productions with less polluting
impact, by adopting new energy systems; while
for the already industrialized countries it is expected to gradually
decrease the pollutant production with a lower propensity to consume,
flanked by new working methods both as performing the production cycle,
which as human resource management. However,
without a common recognition by all countries, without exception, that
has as its starting point the Kyoto Protocol to the enterprise as well
as impossible, seems unnecessary and humanity seems to be heading
towards disaster.
Iscriviti a:
Commenti sul post (Atom)
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento