Migrants: The Macron attitude disappoints

The President of the French Republic, Macron, while praising Italy for its efforts towards aid to migrants, continues to have a closed attitude towards managing the phenomenon, insisting on the distinction between those fleeing from their own countries as refugees And is considered as an economic migrant. This distinction seems merely functional to self-justification for not cooperating with Rome and makes Paris closer and closer to the countries of Eastern Europe, which are distinguished for their opportunism and almost total refusal to the reception. Certainly France says it does not refuse refugees, but closes its ports to the same non-governmental organizations in France, leaving Italy to distinguish between categories of migrants. This position seems totally hypocritical for the history of the French state, which has so contributed to the formation of modern African states, which have been totally invented, which have brought together different ethnic groups and social groups, causing profound tears in social tissues, often Resulting in real civil wars. This historic responsibility should lead to a greater commitment from Paris and the rejection of a commitment, which should be natural, is a sort of double betrayal towards the French past and European solidarity. But these considerations are even more valuable if one wants to define the phenomenon of economic migrants, which is not an empty definition, but which authorizes someone to classify these migrants as unworthy of help. Those who fall into this category are escaping from drought situations that are increasingly caused by droughts that continue from very long periods: water scarcity prevents cultivation, and hence the food supply resulting from agriculture, irreversibly damages the supply chain Breeding, which runs out of lack of forage, causes disastrous hygienic situations that result in increased disease and increases mortality, ranging from the lower bands of the population, passing through older ones, to hit the productive part of the nations Affected by these phenomena. It must be remembered that there is environmental pollution among the causes of drought, whose governments are the rich countries' governments, and whose physical consequences are represented by the gradual increase in desertification. One of the most current debates is to help these populations in their territories to avoid migrations that can take on biblical proportions. These intentions, however, fall into at least medium-term programming and more appropriately, over longer periods, due to the backwardness of the infrastructures of many African countries and the level of desertification they are interested in. Moreover, climate and pollution talk is inseparable from the resolution of migration defined as economic. It is evident that, in the short term, the migratory phenomenon of the economic type is hardly arrestable and does not present large differences from the survival needs that characterize migrations from the theaters of war. Macron's self-determination, and his negative predisposition to migrants, is a serious disappointment with the political man who has defeated the anti-European right, precisely because his attitude is deeply contrary to the values ​​of united Europe and the The point of view of the application of fundamental rights, both in cooperation with another member of the Union in clear difficulties, and denounces a lack of worrying solidarity. Unfortunately, to be a great statistician, it is not enough to be a rampant young man who has defeated the worst right: just after the French election the danger escaped did not fully realize that he had only won the worst. But for the future of Europe, the migrant test bench continues to be the most prominent for its destiny, and Macron, who was very reliant on it, proves to be a politician attentive to the immediate results within its borders, Falling back into the scheme of the occupational politician, the opposite of what he wanted to appear.